What I have built

Tools

Small instruments, each aimed at one question somebody actually arrives with. Nothing here is a demo of a model. Most of them do not involve one at all, and the ones that do say so on the card.

ScopeWhat applies to me?
Deterministic router
AI framework scopingEight questions about how you actually use AI, and three live meters showing whether ISO 42001, the NIST AI RMF or the AU Voluntary AI Safety Standard would earn its place.Proves: Scoring you can read off the screen, with the reasoning shown next to it.
MapHow do my frameworks relate?
Hand-judged corpus, no model involved
The Control MeshNine frameworks, 597 controls and 794 cross-framework mappings, each one carrying the obligation it shares, the evidence that satisfies both, and the objection that breaks it.Proves: 597 controls across nine frameworks, every mapping argued rather than scored.
Deterministic tool, no model involved
Where the mapping breaksExamine where control mappings between frameworks actually break down in practice, based on hand-curated notes. No percentages, just structural gaps.Proves: Live evaluation of mapping strength between framework pairs.
TestWhere does my control fail?
Diagnostic interviewSign in
Pressure TestAn adversarial diagnostic interview that evaluates your controls and tells you what looks weakest, with an assessor persona.Proves: Adversarial interview aimed at where the control actually fails.
WriteWhat must the document contain?
Static annotated artefact
The SkeletonThe decisions a policy has to make, how they are usually got wrong, and a worked extract. Organised by the policy you actually write rather than by control, because nobody writes 597 policies.Proves: Ten policy scaffolds, each listing the controls it answers across every framework.